Footwear Manufacturing - H-1B Visa Sponsors

10 employers in the Footwear Manufacturing industry (NAICS 3162) sponsor H-1B work visas.

đź“Ť Employers in This Industry

Click an employer to view their full sponsorship profile.

Footwear Manufacturing10 total
SHOEBUY.COM, INC
CHARLESTOWN, MA10 filings
VISBE INC
HENDERSON, NV10 filings
SAN ANTONIO SHOE INC
SAN ANTONIO, TX5 filings
OLUKAI LLC
IRVINE, CA4 filings
ROCKY BRANDS, INC
NELSONVILLE, OH4 filings
DUNLOP PROTECTIVE FOOTWEAR LLC
HAVRE DE GRACE, MD3 filings
HILOS INC
PORTLAND, OR3 filings
KORNIT DIGITAL NORTH AMERICA
ENGLEWOOD, NJ3 filings
FOOTWEAR INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC
HOUSTON, TX2 filings
DEER STAGS CONCEPTS, INC
NEW YORK, NY0 filings

Work Visa Categories

H-1B
Most common US work visa for specialty occupations
Annual cap:65,000 + 20,000 (US master’s)
Lottery:Yes, weighted by wage level from FY2027
Duration:3 years, extendable to 6
Spouse work:H-4 EAD if I-140 approved
H-1B Cap-Exempt
No lottery required. Qualifying employers only
Annual cap:None. File any time
Lottery:None. No registration needed
Who qualifies:Nonprofit universities, research orgs, affiliates
Duration:Same as regular H-1B
E-3
Australian nationals only. Cap rarely reached
Annual cap:10,500. Never exhausted
Lottery:None
Duration:2 years, renewable indefinitely
Spouse work:E-3D automatic work authorization
H-1B1
Chile & Singapore nationals. Free Trade Agreement
Annual cap:6,800 (1,400 Chile + 5,400 Singapore)
Lottery:None
Duration:1 year, renewable
Spouse work:No automatic work authorization

H-1B Wage Levels Explained

LEVEL I · ENTRY
“Performs routine tasks requiring limited, if any, exercise of judgment. Work is closely supervised.”
In practice:Work is assigned and checked by a supervisor. The employee is learning the employer’s methods. Mistakes are caught and corrected by others.
Associate EngineerJunior AnalystNew Graduate
1Ă—lottery entry under FY2027 weighted system
If your LCA description lists “5+ years of experience,” “works independently,” or “leads a team”, Level I may be inconsistent with those duties and could attract RFE scrutiny.