Administration of Environmental Quality Programs - H-1B Visa Sponsors

6 employers in the Administration of Environmental Quality Programs industry (NAICS 9241) sponsor H-1B work visas.

đź“Ť Employers in This Industry

Click an employer to view their full sponsorship profile.

Administration of Environmental Quality Programs6 total
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION
ATLANTA, GA8 filings
TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD
AUSTIN, TX2 filings
THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC
WASHINGTON, DC2 filings
NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT
SANTA FE, NM1 filings
PHOTO EMISSION TECH INC
MOORPARK, CA1 filings
STATE OF OREGON - DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PORTLAND, OR1 filings

Work Visa Categories

H-1B
Most common US work visa for specialty occupations
Annual cap:65,000 + 20,000 (US master’s)
Lottery:Yes, weighted by wage level from FY2027
Duration:3 years, extendable to 6
Spouse work:H-4 EAD if I-140 approved
H-1B Cap-Exempt
No lottery required. Qualifying employers only
Annual cap:None. File any time
Lottery:None. No registration needed
Who qualifies:Nonprofit universities, research orgs, affiliates
Duration:Same as regular H-1B
E-3
Australian nationals only. Cap rarely reached
Annual cap:10,500. Never exhausted
Lottery:None
Duration:2 years, renewable indefinitely
Spouse work:E-3D automatic work authorization
H-1B1
Chile & Singapore nationals. Free Trade Agreement
Annual cap:6,800 (1,400 Chile + 5,400 Singapore)
Lottery:None
Duration:1 year, renewable
Spouse work:No automatic work authorization

H-1B Wage Levels Explained

LEVEL I · ENTRY
“Performs routine tasks requiring limited, if any, exercise of judgment. Work is closely supervised.”
In practice:Work is assigned and checked by a supervisor. The employee is learning the employer’s methods. Mistakes are caught and corrected by others.
Associate EngineerJunior AnalystNew Graduate
1Ă—lottery entry under FY2027 weighted system
If your LCA description lists “5+ years of experience,” “works independently,” or “leads a team”, Level I may be inconsistent with those duties and could attract RFE scrutiny.